<body>

Paperback Writer: A Bakersfield, California literature, music and news blog

Bakersfield News And A Lot More...

« Home | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next »

A commentary on World Trade Center - By N.L. Belardes

I was trying to think of names for the movie World Trade Center since the movie isn’t really about the World Trade Center. No history, no build-up, no idea who is in the World Trade Center except at one point in the movie when a statistic is mentioned: 50,000-60,000 people—and all treated like ghosts and practically demonic shadows—nameless ships that pass by in the night.

I thought maybe, The Lobby. But then it’s not really about a lobby. Or The Missing Bad Guys… and although the bad guys are missing from the movie, it’s not really about any bad guys or good guys for that matter. At least Apocalypse Now was a brave movie less than five years after Vietnam. It wasn’t afraid to say, “This was an ugly war and Americans killed and were killed and were traumatized and raped a country and each other,” and so on… hey it was a viewpoint whether you agreed or not and showed the brutality of war on a new level for cinema-goers to ponder.

World Trade Center shows the brutality of large concrete blocks, which is about as grey and lifeless as you can get. That’s about it. I thought maybe the movie could be titled, Brokeback Port Authority—two guys, in love, in a desperate situation… No, that wouldn’t go well with the Oliver Stone fanclub of compromising art, or those who read this blog and can’t take a joke. And besides, it wasn’t even really about the Port Authority, it was about a group of stooges who we don’t even know if they were friends, because we aren’t given any background information. Maybe I should step back and give the movie a daring title. Something risqué, like The Collapse of The American Mind. Yeah, or Below Ground: The Story of Shadows. Shadows because I’m supposed to believe that these two guys were that clueless, and in their conversations while trapped didn’t once speculate as to what happened to them.

You know what gets me? How I could leave a theatre about 9/11 without crying? How? I’ll admit right here and now I’m the most emotional person I know. I’m a big baby who will cry at movies for just the music being sappy. Hell I got emotional at The Devil Wears Prada. Flight 93 brought chills and tears—and how much more devastating were the attacks on the World Trade Center?

Not one tear.

Not even close.

Am I that desensitized? Or is the movie that bad?

It’s that bad, unless you just want to see a patriotic piece of goo about firemen digging rubble. But don’t call it World Trade Center. Title it, The Mole Men of 9/11. And don’t get me wrong. Authority figures and people of uniform in an array of job titles came together and kicked ass. And they died too. But I’m tired of the statistics all about cops and firemen.

The common men and women who were the targets of 9/11 were not the cops and firemen who daringly performed rescues and failed. The common target represented the economic structure of America. What is the average image of a person attacked on 9/11 at the World Trade Center? A woman in a red power suit? A man in a grey suit with a briefcase? What’s wrong with seeing images of the corporate frontlines, white collar workers lined up in the trenches of an exploded building, lives sacrificed simply for working in the greatest towers America ever built? And put any color of man or woman in those suits.

Give me the Apocalypse Now version of 9/11, one that explores the corporate warrior in the buildings through the entire devastation to the bitter end—a story of survival that ends tragically in disaster. The West Coast needs such a movie—one that isn’t afraid to talk economics, terrorists and the gloom of dying in a tie and long-sleeved button-up while trying to escape. Hey, how do you take the reality out of reality? Make a movie about ghosts...

I sat in the back of a bus just a few days after 9/11 and listened to gangbangers talk about 9/11. “Oh yeah, those white fuckers are all dead… they can keep dyin’.”

What?

No compassion.

I see it everyday. I see a lack of compassion in my own family. I see a lack of compassion in the people who walk past me on the way to work. I see a lack of compassion in artists, in musicians, in theatre folk, in fellow writers, in newspapers, in Bakersfield TV, in road rage mongerers, and in myself at times.

I see a peculiar West Coast phenomenon of “It happened to them and it won’t happen to me” mentality. And this crowd of unbelievers needs to see to believe.

Maybe World Trade Center is a just a simple movie about Democrats and Republicans—two opposing views falling into the rubble of the American consciousness. They must come to terms that they don’t understand a damn thing when it all caves in on them—that not even their uniform will rescue them. And just maybe they realize that when they weren’t trapped, they were just as much in the dark as when on the outside looking in.

And that’s just where those kids in the back of the bus are left if watching this movie.

  1. Blogger James Mongold | 12:49 PM |  

    Disaster movies are almost always shit. Look at Pearl Harbor & Titanic... shit. Just because a renowned director made this film, does not guarantee brilliance. I mean, after all.... Scorsese made "Gangs of New York."

  2. Anonymous The Other Meg | 1:11 PM |  

    I don't know what to think about this movie. On one hand, I think it's release may have some healing effect on people (I don't see how, but I guess it's not impossible), but on the other hand I think it could very well just mess people up more. Then again, every 9/11 themed project that has been made has made me mad...sorta like "watch us profit off of a national tragedy!!"

    *grumbles*

  3. Anonymous Norma | 1:49 PM |  

    I can't watch movies like that. An old boyfriend convinced me to watch Apocalypse Now with him once. And I cried until I threw up. True story. He felt so bad because I had warned him, I just can't do it. I can't watch sad, horrific movies based on actual events. He must have thought I was pulling his leg.

  4. Blogger Matildakay | 1:52 PM |  

    I too was very disappointed in this movie. I expected to see the gory reality of the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11. What I saw was a Nicholas Cage Hollywood blockbuster. I really could not believe it.

    It didn't rip my heart out, it didn't make me cry, not even once!

    I wish someone would be brave enough to make a movie about the real 9/11. They could simply call it 9/11, but please tell me the real story...

  5. Anonymous Jarod | 2:33 PM |  

    I see the same mentality among people everywhere too. Where they act like it's fine because it didn't happen to them. sad days..

  6. Blogger dw | 2:37 PM |  

    yeah, compassion. I use to love the visual of the tiny pebble dropped into the still water. The ripples it could cause, just by itself. Trouble is, it seems that there is no more still water in the world. The media and the contollers, and the war mongers just keep the waters swelling with turbulence. By the time we get to them it's useless. Violent games, violent shows...where's the Woody's Toy Circus, where's the cartoon at every movie? Where's the fun and excitement and celebration of life and meaning?... I know where...at Capistranos Aug.19 and 26!!!

  7. Blogger chingpea | 3:41 PM |  

    Brokeback Port Authority and gang bangers?!

    The previews of this movie didn't make me want to go see it. What do I care about these 2 guys' perspective on the whole thing? They wanted to keep the respect of those that didn't survive, yet, they're basting in the glory making the extra $$$ telling their side of event as they saw it.

    I agree with all you said... it looked like a BLAH movie. I'm glad I didn't waste any time on that one. It sounds more like the story of 2 men who were strangers that found love and company in each other amidst all the chaos....don't think anyone expected that... they wanted the action and realism that Hollywood is known for giving not a bubble gum, love story, chick flick in disguise.

    Oh well...

  8. Blogger n.l. | 4:01 PM |  

    OK, I wouldn't call the movie a chick flick. That was a joke. But I had real issues with the film, issues that reflect real life. Jarod definitely gets what I'm talking about. Great comments.

    I haven't seen Gangs from New York. No wonder.

    I just don't want to walk away from any 9/11 film feeling good. It wasn't the 'feel good' event of the New Millennium...

  9. Blogger Julie Jordan Scott | 4:24 PM |  

    I haven't seen this movie yet although I plan to see it.

    I didn't let my children go to school for several days after 9/11.

    I had subscribers and readers of mine from all over the world checking on me. They heard "America" and thought of me, not really thinking, I think, that I lived on the opposite coast. One of my readers from Saudi Arabia sent me a note, and addressed it, "Dear Miss Scott" when I wrote him back I said, flippantly, "Call me Julie" (meaning in a polite way, don't ever ever ever use just "Scott" as my surname, but he didn't know how sensitive I am about that, LOL -and when I got home from a meeting, there was a message on my voice mail from him. He thought I meant PHONE me, Julie, he was looking for some way to help me, to offer assistance to me in what he thought was my time of need.

    I wrote a piece that went on to be published in a special version of "Chicken Soup for the Soul" especially about the tragedy... and I wrote about watching the Twin Towers get built, how watching them go up was so monumental for all of us who witnessed their rise in the skyline. When I was really young the Empire State Building was the big thing to look for as we drove towards Manhattan, where Daddy worked, from suburban New Jersey.

    Seeing that skyline now, devoid of the towers I still cry, like right now, I cry. I see photos of them in old movies, I cry.

    There are orphaned kids at my elementary school in Glen Ridge, NJ. Both parents killed.

    My heart aches, realizing it has been almost five years. Five years.

    I almost went on a rant about the Iraqi war, but I don't want to get mad about that. I would rather, oddly, sit with tears in my eyes over the tragedy of five years of apathy in the wake of what happened.

    Apathy. Now that is the kiss of death. Apathy.

  10. Blogger dw | 6:52 PM |  

    "9/11", by Jules and Gedeon Naudet(2001)?

  11. Anonymous Anonymous | 8:20 PM |  

    Well, you just convinced me not to go see that movie.

    Good post.

    Think about all of the movies made about WWII. Most of them are pretty bad and only interesting as period pieces. Hollywood will have more misses than hits when it comes to 9/11, Afghanstan and Iraq, but I don't mind them trying.

    howardowens.com

  12. Blogger dw | 8:28 PM |  

    So no one saw "9/11"? The documentary(2001), filmed by brothers Jules and Gedeon Naudet, about a rookie N.Y.C. firefighter? They were right there. Great! I do apologize for my earlier take on this blog. I wasn't finding humor in 9/11, as I was someone expecting a Nicholas cage movie to be the great American tragedy film. ok, that was harsh. Horrible deaths, friends and families changed for ever... People on the sidelines changed forever. People on the sidelines thinking about conspiracies, religious extremists, American haters, race haters, where's Osama?, why Iraq?, Apathy, sympathy...I don't need a new movie to capture or stir my sad feelings. Almost everyday there is some reference to this tragedy, and my prayers go out to those people living without someone right now, right this minute. To the people of New York also, as we can't fully know your heart break and void. Just like those DUI commercials where someone was killed. The clips of those people when they were alive, dancing around, goofing with their families, then the blank screen hits "killed by a drunk driver"! I don't need the graphic accident to pull out every tear I own. The memory of the life lived is the gut wrencher.

  13. Blogger n.l. | 9:07 PM |  

    For a war film, World Trade Center was a really crappy war film... I love old war movies... at least you got a sense of who the enemy was and who all the buddies were going off to war... Give me John Wayne movies any day... The Longest Day (1962), or all those great actors in A Bridge Too Far (1977). Or how about Force Ten From Navarone (1978). Or The Big Red One (1980).

    Now there is one war movie that World Trade Center reminded me of in some weird way... Hell in the Pacific (1968) with Lee Marvin... two enemies stranded... who bond a kind of love... much better conflict in that flick...

  14. Blogger n.l. | 9:08 PM |  

    Yeah, I don't mind Hollywood trying either...

  15. Blogger Kenny | 9:25 PM |  

    Why would we need a movie, it was live on tv. How much more do you really need to see? Crazy bastards flying planes into buildings and killing mass amounts of people. You really want to watch that again?

  16. Blogger n.l. | 9:37 PM |  

    Maybe that's just it, Kenny. I never saw it on TV until long after the buildings fell...

  17. Blogger n.l. | 7:35 AM |  

    What can you say about Julie Jordan Scott's comment... apathy is a wasteland.

    The Naudet film is being re-released with some new interviews, in a supposed less watered down version...

  18. Blogger dw | 8:32 AM |  

    The reason I liked Naudets' "9/11", is they were merely filming a documentary on a rookie firefighter. A true, real story of life, when all of a sudden the tragedy in N.Y. hits. That's all. It may not be the defining 9/11 movie for everyone, but it was a good one to watch. But honestly, with all the conspiracy theories out there on 9/11 with the World Trade Center, the supposed Government goofs on 9/11, the relationship with Osama pre-9/11, Bush reading the children's book...blah, blah, blah...you've heard it all, how could there realistically be an in your face, down and dirty, hardcore Hollywood production on this subject. The fact that this film didn't touch on a lot of that might bring some truth to what we've been hearing on the sidelines. Just a thought.

  19. Anonymous Norma | 3:14 PM |  

    "I don't need the graphic accident to pull out every tear I own. The memory of the life lived is the gut wrencher." ---
    That's how I feel, I think. I don't find comfort in watching a movie that is meant to "entertain me" about a REAL tragedy someone suffered. I've never been able to do that. Even Titanic.... which YES I know was all "HOLLYWOOD". A cute love story, etc. But when it got to the part where people were falling off the ship... I felt like throwing up and I had to walk away. Titanic is probably not the nest example. But I had to use it as one since I don't watch the "other" type of movies based on real events. How could I sit there and watch something that actually happened. And watch it as a form of entertainment? So wether WTC was a good movie or not... I will never know or EVER care to watch. Just like 9/11 or Apocolypse Now..or anything close to it. I know for some people it brings closure.. or whatever. It's just not for me.

  20. Blogger n.l. | 3:20 PM |  

    How do you define a film that has happened in real life? What do you want, the cartoon version so you can feel better? There are some cartoons out there based on real events... is it just that more than one person died at WTC? And TV mimics real life. Might as well ignore every violent murder mystery on TV, cause I'm sure there's truth in every fiction...

  21. Anonymous Norma | 4:35 PM |  

    You really think Spongebob could be based on reality? A pineapple and a squirrel couldn’t survive under the sea, IMO. LOL Ok, listen… I can’t watch war movies PERIOD because even when the “bad guy” dies, I can't help but think, that bad guy was somebody’s son, husband, father. And that soldier was fighting for what he believed in. And for his country. And that bad guy prayed for his god to be on his side. Just like we pray to God to protect OUR soldiers. Sure, he may have been on the wrong side, but it still makes me sad.

    Aside from that aspect of war movies, and going back to World Trade Center movie, there is also this: When 9/11 happened, I was like Julia. I was freaked out. I didn’t want to send my kids to school. I wanted to keep them locked up in their rooms forever. I wanted to go out and buy supplies of food and water, and never step out of my house. I wanted to self medicate to take the heartache away. Like all of America, I felt vulnerable, scared, depressed. I couldn’t stop watching the news. I kept expecting for something else to happen. Crazy stuff like bombings in my back yard, takeovers in my neighborhood. I wanted to go out and stockpile dozens and dozens of guns “just in case”. YES I was losing it. I don’t want to relive that again. I don’t necessarily want to forget. But I don’t want to relive it either. Especially not in a theatre while eating popcorn and slurping on coke. Another thing, Titanic wasn’t only not the Nest example.. it also wasn’t the BEST example. Sorry about that typo! And TV? Who has time to watch tv? Not me. Not unless it's Spongebob with my kids on a lazy Saturday afternoon.

  22. Blogger dw | 8:11 PM |  

    yeah, I admit it, some times I like a good cartoon, takes me away. I can't explain the complex simplicity of my little human mind. But apathy is not completely correct in my opinion, when it comes to tragedys. My human brain and spirit can take so much input, and then it's like shut down or something. 9/11 was horrible, and are there any more terrible -hundreds/thousands/millions-deathtoll tragedies? yes...do we sit down everyday and scroll through all of them from the beginning of mankind? That would fill more than a complete day of prayer thats for sure. Does that make me callous and cold? If we were blessed to wake up this morning, then geez laweez, just try to help someone around you today, say a prayer for those mourning any loss, walk forward not backward. I don't know. We have to get back to family biz, job biz, daily needs,whatever. I don't call it apathy, just humans doing the human thing. I know some people who have gone through serious horrible tragedy's of loss, and they all, after a short while said they had to get back to their routine of work, cause they were going crazy sitting around the house. Does that qualify apathy? I don't think so.

leave a response